Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Wade Matterson’

Surviving the longevity “Sharknado”

October 21st, 2013 No comments

Matterson-WadeYou’re probably well aware of the Sharknado phenomenon—a straight-to-television disaster movie, where a water spout lifts sharks out of the ocean and deposits them in downtown Los Angeles. The heroes deal admirably with this inexplicable influx of predators and after much bloodshed, emerge victorious.

While the movie was distinctly B grade, the media hype that accompanied it was simply astonishing. It got me thinking about what makes a good/bad disaster movie, given the formulaic approach they tend to adopt:

1. Think of some absurd concept—the crazier the better.
2. Identify with an individual or group fighting to survive.
3. Against all odds, and with much bloodshed, the hero overcomes all.

This is all well and good, but what does this have to do with financial planning? Well, it seems that as an industry we are potentially in the midst of our very own, slow-moving disaster movie—that is, the onslaught of the aging population and the impact of longevity. Now while seeing a great white pointer coming out of a tornado may seem slightly more daunting than a geriatric surfing a tidal wave, the impact of the latter is much more profound, predictable, and likely.

The statistics themselves are simply staggering. By 2050, almost a quarter of the population will be over 65 compared to 14% now. Given that almost 65% of all superannuation assets are held by people between the age of 45 and 54, the amount of money in motion as this group retires will be too large to ignore. As our “Politics of Pensions” thought piece highlights, the implications are broad and will impact on all corners of the Australian community, from business owners and taxpayers through to government policy makers.

When observed through this lens, the impending pressure of longevity has much in common with our traditional disaster movie. It’s no surprise that much of the language adopted by the media and those in the industry attempting to highlight the issues is very similar to what you might find on a movie poster—the “Longevity Tsunami” paper written by the Actuaries Institute (available here) is a good example.

Combine this with the impact of the sweeping reform that the industry has been subjected to, together with rapid technological advances, and the industry is facing a perfect storm (another great disaster epic). The ramifications for the advice industry are immense. Faced with increased demand, regulation, and complexity, there is both a risk and opportunity that presents itself to those up to the challenge.

Fortunately, we’re already seeing potential heroes step up to take on these issues head on. Successful advisers and early movers in this space appear to be taking similar paths, by:

• Retooling their advice proposition to become more strategic in nature, with increasing focus on client objectives
• Developing a hunger for understanding the complexity of the issues and becoming subject matter experts
• Leveraging the latest analytical tools to offer greater insight and value add

From the perspective of this website, both Lonsec and Milliman have set out to accompany you on this mission. As your partners, we intend to provide you with the necessary advice, research, and tools—all in a single and convenient location. We understand that there is not a silver bullet to solve these issues and that ultimately it will be a joint effort.

To this end, this site intends to provide relevant information across the following areas, including:

• Thought leadership
• Research
• Portfolio construction guidance and advice

There are also some exciting plans for the future, including the development of discussion forums and a variety of tools to assist advisers in their implementation of objectives-based advice.

Most importantly, we believe that the subscriber community has plenty to add in this space and that we will all benefit from the sharing of experience. You’re invited to participate in the conversation and we look forward to your comments.

With all this at your fingertips, we’ll help you navigate the challenges and avoid becoming shark bait.

This article first appeared at LonsecRetire.com.au.

Lifecycle funds, version 2.0

August 29th, 2013 No comments

Smart defaults, lifecycle investing, and target date funds have been widely discussed since the global financial crisis highlighted the flaws in the traditional asset allocation approaches adopted for superannuation fund members. Superannuation is a type of long-term investment arrangement designed to help individuals accumulate savings for their retirement. It is a government-mandated program in Australia, akin to North America’s 401(k) system.

A recent article authored by Wade Matterson entitled “Sci-fi super” discusses a new generation of lifecycle approaches that use cutting-edge technologies to strengthen investment strategies exposed by the global financial crisis.

Here is an excerpt:

…The next generation of life cycle funds has learned from the mistakes of the past and addressed them via the use of three key features or enhancements to the existing vehicle. They can best be described as:

• Proximity sensors – broader mandates or strategic asset allocation ranges that can take into account views with respect to asset valuations and seek to navigate through them.

• A traffic GPS system – this has been implemented through the adoption of glide paths that target levels of volatility, rather than equity/bond allocations.

• Air bags – installing explicit risk management through the use of approaches such as hedging or tail-risk strategies that are capable of dealing with unforeseen events when the risk is the greatest.

Milliman’s Financial Risk Management (FRM) practice has helped in the implementation of these concepts in lifecycle funds in the United States and is currently exploring other options to bring these ideas to defined contribution (DC) participants.

Australia exemplifies a changing world of pension systems

January 2nd, 2013 No comments

Aging workforces, longer lifespans, and deteriorating global economies have placed the future of retirement systems at risk. In this issue of Benefits Perspectives, Wade Matterson spotlights Australia’s superannuation retirement system as he examines reasons government intervention in pension policies are anticipated moving forward.

Here is an excerpt from his article:

Private industry is already in the early stages of evolving to address some of these problems. The market participants are reacting, driven by the need to provide better outcomes for workers and retirees. Whilst embryonic in many cases, examples of these activities include:

Greater segmentation of members and their needs, e.g., the trend to review one-size-fits-all investment models (or default funds) in place of developing investment strategies that are more focused on individual objectives and that take a holistic view of members financial affairs.

Offerings that target these segments, including product, advice and distribution, including the development of lifecycle investment options, personalized overlays and other longevity products (e.g., variable annuities), as well as emerging advice models that range from single-issue advice to intrafund and holistic approaches.

New models emerging such as self-managed and direct investment alternatives. Whilst this trend has arguably come about in part because of the perceived failings of large institutional pension plans, the trend towards greater control and individual tailoring has been established and many funds now appear to be developing the capability to offer similar solutions to the membership.

Improved efficiency, competition, and choice in the retail provision of retirement benefits could further lessen dependency on governments by creating a more educated and informed member. Armed with knowledge about saving, investing, spending and other retirement planning information, members should experience improved decision-making and outcomes (i.e., mitigate behavioral risks that lead to mismanagement of pension assets).

Choice is the key to retirement planning

June 7th, 2010 No comments

In a recent article in the Australian Financial Review, Sydney-based Milliman Financial Risk Management (FRM) practice leader Wade Matterson argues that market-based private sector solutions are the only effective means to address “longevity risk” in the Australian retirement income system. His comments, in response to aspects of the federal Treasury Secretary Ken Henry’s review of the Australian taxation system, are germane to retirement policy and regulation around the world.

“A mandated solution,” he writes, “where the government makes it compulsory to purchase a particular longevity product—or worse, offers their own—would only hinder the system further.”

Instead, by giving the private sector the chance to innovate solutions, we can address what is essentially a multi-faceted, complex problem. “There are no silver bullet solutions” and the one-size-fits-all approaches that governments tend to favor essentially remove the consumer from the equation.

Government has an important role, however. It can help provide the regulatory environment and healthy long-term bond market that underwrite what the private sector retirement income system needs: certainty.

“Given the right rules, the market will develop retirement products that benefit investors.”

Boosting Australia’s underdeveloped annuity market

May 22nd, 2010 No comments

Milliman’s Sydney-based Financial Risk Management (FRM) practice leader Wade Matterson provides some perspective on Australia’s efforts to boost its underdeveloped annuities market, in an article by Anthony Sibilin in the May 20 edition of the Business Review Weekly. The article is about the wide-scale analysis of taxation—the “Henry Tax Review”—currently being conducted by federal Treasury Secretary Ken Henry. One important aspect of the review, of course, concerns pensions and the effect of longevity risk on retirement products, funding, and planning.

The debate focuses on whether government should enter the annuities markets with its own products.

Matterson thinks not, at least as a major provider of annuity products. “It is relatively early days in the whole longevity debate,” he says, noting that it’s premature for government to take responsibility without first giving the private sector an opportunity to develop solutions.

He thinks that the tsunami of Boomer retirees will actually accelerate private sector innovation and product development “with or without a nudge from government.”

Revisiting asset allocation strategies

April 19th, 2010 No comments

The global financial crisis has called into question a lot of commonly held assumptions about retirement planning, especially when it comes to tried and true asset allocation models.

In light of these developments, Andrew Fisher and Wade Matterson of Milliman’s Australian Financial Risk Management practice revisit asset-allocation strategies for defined contribution retirement plans. Their article details some “promising approaches” for fund managers to lessen risk through diversification, hedging, and insurance—framed, respectively, as administration strategies, derivative strategies, and insurance/outsourcing strategies.

The authors examine the types of risk—longevity, market, inflation, health, and behavioral—that affect risk management strategies in light of “the long-term nature of retirement . . . and the fiduciary responsibilities of fund trustees” that complicate traditional insurance-based approaches to risk management.