Milliman has released the results of its Fall 2017 Multiemployer Pension Funding Study, which analyzes the funded status of all multiemployer pension plans. As of June 30, 2017, these plans are nearing the healthiest they’ve been since U.S. financial markets collapsed in 2008. In the first six months of 2017, the aggregate funding percentage for all multiemployer pensions climbed from 77% to 81%, reducing the system’s shortfall by $21 billion—an improvement driven largely by favorable investment returns.
In aggregate, asset growth for multiemployer plans far outpaced assumptions for the first half of 2017. But that bears little weight for critical plans, which are hurt by their substantially lower asset bases. Despite the bull market, we’re seeing the funding gap continue to widen between critical and noncritical plans.
While noncritical plans are nearing an aggregate funded percentage of 90%, the funding level for critical plans remains around 60%. Currently about a quarter of the plans tracked by Milliman’s Multiemployer Study fall within critical levels, with some of the most troubled on track to rely on assistance from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)—which itself is facing severe financial challenges. Comparatively, of the approximately 1,250 plans analyzed in the study, around 75% are considered noncritical.
To view the complete study, click here.
Also, to receive regular updates of Milliman’s pension funding analysis, contact us here.
Milliman has released the results of its Spring 2017 Multiemployer Pension Funding Study, which analyzes the funded status of all multiemployer pension plans. As of December 31, 2016, these plans have an aggregate funding percentage of 77%, a 1% increase since June 2016. During that six-month period, the market value of assets increased by $17 billion while pension liabilities increased by $13 billion, resulting in a $4 billion decrease in the aggregate funding status shortfall.
But results vary by plan; while noncritical plans experienced an aggregate funding percentage of nearly 85%, the funding level for critical plans is under 60%. The gap continues to widen between critical and noncritical plans. While the funding percentage of healthier plans has increased slightly, critical plans have seen no appreciable increase. Persistent strong returns would be needed to see any appreciable improvement in funded status.
A closer look into how contributions are distributed shows that plans facing severe funding challenges only spend 38 cents of each contribution dollar on new benefit accruals, while 50 cents of every dollar goes to pay down funding shortfalls. Healthier plans spend 56 cents per contribution dollar on benefit accruals and 32 cents on funding shortfalls. The remaining 12 cents in both scenarios is spent on expenses.
This is the first of three pension funding studies Milliman will be releasing this week. To view the complete study, click here. To receive regular updates of Milliman’s pension funding analysis, contact us here.